|
Summary
This month Mo details the ins and outs of hash-bang (#!
) and validating line commands. Read on and you'll agree: testing for arguments is simply "good programming practice." (1,400 words)
UNIX 101 | ||
By Mo Budlong |
doit
The user had to know to type:
/bin/ksh doit
or:
/bin/csh doit
To remedy this, a clever change was made to the Unix kernel -- now a
script can be written beginning with a hash-bang (#!
) combination on
the first line, followed by a shell that executes the script. As an example, take a look at the following script, named doit
:
#! /bin/ksh
#
# do some script here
#
In this example, the kernel reads in the script doit
, sees the hash-bang, and continues reading the rest of the line, where it finds /bin/ksh
.
The kernel then starts the Korn shell with doit
as an argument and
feeds it the script, as if the following command had been issued:
/bin/ksh doit
When /bin/ksh
begins reading in the script, it sees the hash-bang in the first line as a comment (because it starts with
a hash) and ignores it. To be run, the full path to the shell is required, as the
kernel does not search your PATH
variable. The hash-bang handler in the
kernel does more than just run an alternate shell; it actually takes
the argument following the hash-bang and uses it as a command, then
adds the name of the file as an argument to that command.
You could start a Perl script named doperl
by using the hash-bang:
#! /bin/perl
# do some perl script here
If you begin by typing doperl
, the kernel spots the hash-bang,
extracts the /bin/perl
command, then runs it as if you had typed:
/bin/perl doperl
There are two mechanisms in play that allow this to work. The first is the kernel interpretation of the hash-bang; the second is that Perl sees the first line as a comment and ignores it. This technique will not work for scripting languages that fail to treat lines starting with a hash as a comment; in those cases, it will most likely cause an error. You needn't limit your use of this method to running scripts either, although that is where it's most useful.
The following script, named helpme
, types itself to the terminal when
you enter the command helpme
:
#! /bin/cat
vi unix editor
man manual pages
sh Bourne Shell
ksh Korn Shell
csh C Shell
bash Bourne Again Shell
This kernel trick will execute one argument after the name of the
command. To hide the first line, change the file to use more
by
starting at line 2, but be sure to use the correct path:
#! /bin/more +2
vi unix editor
man manual pages
sh Bourne Shell
ksh Korn Shell
csh C Shell
bash Bourne Again Shell
Typing helpme
as a command causes the kernel to convert this to:
/bin/more +2 helpme
Everything from line 2 onward is displayed:
helpme
vi unix editor
man manual pages
sh Bourne Shell
ksh Korn Shell
csh C Shell
bash Bourne Again Shell
etc.
You can also use this technique to create apparently useless scripts, such as a file that removes itself:
#! /bin/rm
If you named this file flagged
, running it would cause the command
to be issued as if you had typed:
/bin/rm flagged
You could use this in a script to indicate that you are running something, then execute the script to remove it:
#! /bin/ksh
# first refuse to run if the flagged file exists
if [-f flagged ]
then
exit
fi
# create the flag file
echo "#! /bin/rm" >flagged
chmod a+x flagged
# do some logic here
# unflag the process by executing the flag file
flagged
Before you begin building long commands with this technique, keep in mind that systems often have an upper limit (typically 32 characters) on the length of the code in the #!
line.
Testing command line arguments and usage
When you write a shell script, arguments are commonly needed for it to
function properly. In order to ensure that those arguments make sense, it's
often necessary to validate them.
Testing for enough arguments is the easiest method of validation. For
example, if you've created a shell script that requires two file names to
operate, test for at least two arguments on the command line. To do
this in the Bourne and Korn shells, check the value of $#
-- a variable
that contains the count of arguments, other than the command itself. It
is also good practice to include a message detailing the reasons why the command
failed; this is usually created in a usage function.
The script twofiles
below tests for two arguments on the command line:
#! /bin/ksh
# twofile script handles two files named on the command line
# a usage function to display help for the hapless user
usage ()
{
echo "twofiles"
echo "usage: twofiles file1 file2"
echo "Processes two files"
}
# test if we have two arguments on the command line
if [ $# != 2 ]
then
usage
exit
fi
# we are ok at this point so continue processing here
A safer practice is to validate as much as you can before running your
execution. The following version of twofiles
checks the argument count and tests both files. If file 1 doesn't exist (if [ 1 ! -f $1 ]
) an error message is set up, a usage is displayed, and the program exits. The same is done for file 2:
#! /bin/ksh
# twofile script handles two files named on the command line
# a usage function to display help for the hapless user
# plus an additional error message if it has been filled in
usage ()
{
echo "twofiles"
echo "usage: twofiles file1 file2"
echo "Processes two files"
echo " "
echo $errmsg
}
# test if we have two arguments on the command line
if [ $# != 2 ]
then
usage
exit
fi
# test if file one exists and send an additional error message
# to usage if not found
if [ ! -f $1 ]
then
errmsg=${1}":File Not Found"
usage
exit
fi
# same for file two
if [ ! -f $2 ]
then
errmsg=${2}":File Not Found"
usage
exit
fi
# we are ok at this point so continue processing here
Note that in the Korn shell you can also use the double bracket test
syntax, which is faster. The single bracket test actually calls a
program named test
to test the values, while the double bracket test
is built into the Korn shell and does not have to call a separate
program.
The double bracket test will not work in the Bourne shell:
if [[ $# != 2 ]]
or
if [[ ! -f $1 ]]
or
if [[ ! -f $2 ]]
This thorough validation can prevent later errors in the program logic
when a file is suddenly found missing. Consider it good programming
practice.
About the author
Mo Budlong, president of King Computer Services Inc., specializes in Unix and client/server consulting and training. He currently publishes the COBOL Just In Time Course, a crash course for the year 2000 problem, as well as COBOL Dates and the Year 2000, which offers date solutions. |
Advertisement: Support SunWorld, click here! |
Resources and Related Links | ||
|
Tell Us What You Thought of This Story | ||
|
If you have technical problems with this magazine, contact webmaster@sunworld.com
URL: http://www.sunworld.com/swol-09-1999/swol-09-unix101.html
Last modified: